후기비트겐슈타인의 관점에서 본 종교경험

정승태

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 정승태

저널정보: 한국조직신학회 한국조직신학논총 한국조직신학논총 제23호

발행연도: 2009.1

수록면: 123 - 149 (27page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

The purpose of this thesis is to develop a understanding of religious experience from a later Wittgenstein perspective. In oder to develop this thesis, the deep epistemological dichotomy between foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism is a central issue in religious experience. As Richard Bernstein defines, foundationalism means “the effort to achieve an undistorted contact between the mirror of the mind and reality,” and anti/non foundationalism means “the basic conviction that when we turn to the examination of those concepts, we are forced to recognized that in the final analysis all such rationality, truth, reality, right, the good, or norms must be as relative to a specific conceptual scheme, theoretical framework, paradigm, form of life, society or culture.” Given these basic definitions of foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism, the interpretations of religious experience can be explained into two realms. One is that religious experience can be understood as a inner or private experience of believer. This presupposes religious experience as supernatural phenomenon. The other is that religious experience can be understood as a rational or factual phenomenon. This experience should be met the criteria of truthclaims, and thus all experience included religious experience should be factual statements because of correspondent view of truth. However, these two interpretations takes two epistemological stances of foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism as insufficient conditions of religious experience. In this reason, a later Wittgenstein philosophy for developing religious experience can be considered as a alternative way. The religious experience of a later Wittgenstein perspective, which rooted in anti/non foundational epistemology, discusses two meanings. First, the later Wittgenstein philosophy defines religious experience as the notion of cultural-linguistic discourse. In this discourse, experience is not the primary element but culture or language is the primary element. Second, the later Wittgenstein philosophy means it as the notion of intratextuality. This implies that a priori text determines our experience. As a result, the religious experience from a later Wittgenstein perspective can be understood as a public, cultural and linguistic. Therefore, the later Wittgenstein experience of religion confirms that a priori experience of culture and language determines religious experience.

The purpose of this thesis is to develop a understanding of religious experience from a later Wittgenstein perspective. In oder to develop this thesis, the deep epistemological dichotomy between foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism is a central issue in religious experience. As Richard Bernstein defines, foundationalism means “the effort to achieve an undistorted contact between the mirror of the mind and reality,” and anti/non foundationalism means “the basic conviction that when we turn to the examination of those concepts, we are forced to recognized that in the final analysis all such rationality, truth, reality, right, the good, or norms must be as relative to a specific conceptual scheme, theoretical framework, paradigm, form of life, society or culture.” Given these basic definitions of foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism, the interpretations of religious experience can be explained into two realms. One is that religious experience can be understood as a inner or private experience of believer. This presupposes religious experience as supernatural phenomenon. The other is that religious experience can be understood as a rational or factual phenomenon. This experience should be met the criteria of truthclaims, and thus all experience included religious experience should be factual statements because of correspondent view of truth. However, these two interpretations takes two epistemological stances of foundationalism and anti/non foundationalism as insufficient conditions of religious experience. In this reason, a later Wittgenstein philosophy for developing religious experience can be considered as a alternative way. The religious experience of a later Wittgenstein perspective, which rooted in anti/non foundational epistemology, discusses two meanings. First, the later Wittgenstein philosophy defines religious experience as the notion of cultural-linguistic discourse. In this discourse, experience is not the primary element but culture or language is the primary element. Second, the later Wittgenstein philosophy means it as the notion of intratextuality. This implies that a priori text determines our experience. As a result, the religious experience from a later Wittgenstein perspective can be understood as a public, cultural and linguistic. Therefore, the later Wittgenstein experience of religion confirms that a priori experience of culture and language determines religious experience.

#종교경험 #후기 비트겐슈타인 #정초주의 #반/비정초주의 #언어놀이 #Religious Experience #Later Wittgenstein #Foundationalism #Anti/Nonfoundationalism #Language game

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

Alston, William / 1993 / Perceiving God: Epistemology of Religious Experience / Cornell University Press

Bernstein, Richard / 1983 / Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis / University of Pennsylvania Press

Chung, Seong-Tae / 2002 / The Epistemological Account of Objectivism and Relativism for Implications of Theological Hermeneutics / K o r e a Journal of Christian Studies 25 :

Grenz, Stanley J. / 2001 / Beyond Foundationalism / Westminster John Knox Press

Grube, Dirk-Martin / 1995 / Religious Experience after the Demise of Foundationalism / Religious Studies 31 : 37 ~ 52

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

정승태

소속기관 한국조직신학회

주요연구분야 인문학 > 종교학 > 기독교신학

논문수 1 이용수 11

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (23)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)