메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
21세기영어영문학회 영어영문학21 영어영문학21 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
33 - 55 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay analyses Sarah Kane's Blasted in the theories of Antonin Artaud, Marquis De Sade, and of Gilles Deleuze. As one of the Thatcher's children, Kane very well recognized what was placed beneath the social order of Britain in her age which was violence. Therefore in Blasted and in all of her career, trying to find new theatrical forms which called later the experimental theatre, she sought to break from the old British theatrical style which was a journalistic realism functioning as a ‘talking head’. Artaud's theory of the theatre of cruelty tells us how Blasted worked as a play that affect audience's emotion directly by the cruelties of the play. According to Artaud, ‘first comes the emotion, the thinking afterword' is the way of the theatre working. Extrapolating on the basis of the theory of Sade, we are able to understand what was a hidden principle of Britain, at least her generation. Kane made an attempt to reveal it and wanted theatre-goers to notice that principle. The theory of Deleuze, expecially on Spinoza's ethics, explains what kind of ethics possible in Blasted. It is ethics of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ rather than ‘good’ and ‘evil’. Characters in the play show how to follow good mode of being and how to deny bad mode of being by their relations to each others. Blasted is certain one of the most shocking plays in the contemporary theatre, but distinctly is the play that opens up a new ethical possibility.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0