메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국고전르네상스영문학회 고전 르네상스 영문학 고전 르네상스 영문학 제15권 제2호
발행연도
2006.1
수록면
27 - 52 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Jang Hyun NamShakespeare's play, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, has often been regarded as one of his weakest efforts. It has been criticised by many readers and often branded as a strange combination of the 'ludicrous' and 'careless'. However, a closer examination of the text reveals that this may have been a deliberate attempt by Shakespeare who, by balancing the ludicrous and the serious, sought to give his drama an educative function. Shakespeare's educational method is closely related to the ideal teaching methods of humanists, who advocated 'teaching through amusement.' This aspect can be regarded as more appropriate when one of the themes Shakespeare treats in The Two Gentlemen of Verona is the humanist education of gentlemen in Elizabethan England. The reality of education and the development of 'gentlemen' are parodied at a number of levels, while comic elements remain undamaged. Examining the goals and relationships of the principal characters in the context of humanist education serves to demonstrate that the play is not just a bizzare mixture of seriousness and ludicrousness but in fact a well-planned drama. Through the use of satire and parody, Shakespeare was able to connect with the audience to both entertain them, and educate them with regard to the reality of the education of gentlemen in his day. It is also a very effective way to demonstrate the difference between the ideal and the real images of perfect gentlemen as represented by Proteus and Valentine in their own separate ways.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0