지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A comparative analysis of old European maps is performed to empirically determine the legitimacy of the name “East Sea.” For this purpose, some old maps manufactured in Europe are selected to analyze the forms and names of the logistic routes. This study obtained the following results:The global enterprise management area expanded and the business value increased, it changed the view of global logistic routes.
First, The 21st century is experiencing a more heated international competition for management between neighboring countries while the importance of the global logistic routes increases.
Second, the European logistic route similar to the East Sea in terms of form and size include the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, and the Ionian Sea. Of these, the North Sea has the largest amount of similarities to the East Sea.
Third, it is the North Sea that is shared by three or more countries and has a similar form to the East Sea.
Fourth, the Baltic Sea, the Ionian Sea, and the Aegean Sea each has a single logistic route name in principle, but has never been named after a specific country.
Fifth, among other global logistic routes around the world, the Japan sea is the only case that is shared by three or more countries and is named after a specific country.
Sixth, naming a global logistic route shared by three or more countries after one of the said countries is associated with violating the sovereignty of the other countries.
Seventh, the case analysis of the names of the European logistic route can provide a model that suggests how to name the logistic route over which disputes persist between Korea and Japan.
In view for the results so far achieved, the name East Sea is considered most legitimate for the logistic route shared by three or more countries in the east of the Eurasian continent
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0