메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
344 - 356 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to explore how small-group argumentation differs according to the features of the classification task involved. For this purpose, three different tasks (classifying bolts and nuts, animals, and plants) were developed and applied to 7th grade students. Data from students' discourse, individual written work, and in-depth interviews with students were used to characterize differences in small-group argumentation. As a result, reasoning patterns in small-group argumentation were identified which differed according to the features of the task involved. Students showed more elaborated rebuttals and advanced utterances when they were evaluating other groups' classification trees than they did in constructing their own classification tree. Considering the validity of classification criteria made discussions prolonged and lengthened reasoning chains as students were arguing which group's tree was the best. In addition, task topics with which students were familiar and which required less complex knowledge for the classification provided them with opportunities to reason collaboratively. These results imply that task features should be considered when we develop argumentation tasks for promoting small-group discussion and argumentation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0