메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한법의학회 대한법의학회지 대한법의학회지 제38권 제4호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
139 - 144 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Both death certificates and postmortem examination certificates are used as proofof death. These certificates sometimes contain erroneous information but how frequentlythey do so is unknown. In particular, only a few studies have measured theaccuracy of the cause and manner of death on Korea death documents. In this study,we compared the cause and manner of death on both kinds of certificates with thoseon autopsy reports to determine the frequency of errors, and to identify way toimprove the accuracy of these certificates. In 2012, 528 autopsies were requested ofout institute, and certificates were submitted in 241 of the cases. The manner of deathwas classified as natural, unnatural, or unknown. The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the death certificate in 37 of 63 cases (58.7%), and the mannerof death matched in 40 of 63 cases (63.5%). The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the postmortem examination certificate in 62 of 178 cases(34.8%), and the manner of death matched in 74 of 178 cases (41.6%). Death certificatesand postmortem examination certificates are important documents. We identifiedmany incorrect reports of causes and manners of death on both kinds of documents,especially the postmortem death certificates. These inaccuracies are presumablydue to a lack of forensic information and education, as well as lack of interest onthe part of medical doctors.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0