메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: The Pap smear has brought about a dramatic improvement in the prevention of cervical cancer in women worldwide. In an effort to decrease the occasional false negatives in the Pap smear and further increase the screened population, ThinPrep Pap Test (TP), a fluid-based cytology collection method, has been developed. With preservation of claimed advantages of TP, we have developed a Pap test solution for manual preparatory process and compared our manually processed fluid-based Pap smear with TP to identify cytologic similarities and differences between the two methods. Methods: Cervical swipes of 204 patients were prospectively collected in the ‘Pap solution’ and also in PreservCyt solution for TP. Diagnoses and smear characteristics were compared. Results: The diagnoses of the paired smears agreed in 190 of the 204 cases (93.1%). The smear characteristics regarding overall cellularity and background cellularities were similar in the two methods and the stainability of the cells was virtually the same. Conclusions: The ‘Pap solution’ has similar performance characteristics as TP in many aspects. With its advantages of cost-effectiveness and easier preparatory process, the ‘Pap solution’ can match previously implemented thin layer preparation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0