메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국농공학회 한국농공학회논문집 한국농공학회논문집 제55권 제3호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
85 - 89 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the current domestic, many industrial accidents have happened. And these are analyzed according to several factors. But it isdifficult that they evaluate their business safety. Thus, we conducted a study on business specific safety assessment techniques inorder that business know their safety level and perform appropriative safety activities. Study methods are survey and AHP (AnalyticHierarchy Process). Each specific weighting factors to calculate the survey was conducted for safety and consulting experts (20 persons). Weight factor was used to AHP decision support as one of the ways through a number of alternatives to the ratings for theMinesota Multiphasic. Factors are each type of industry, specific industrial scale, disaster type and strength, worker age and tenureperiod, and region. First, survey was conducted with 20 professionals to estimate the weighting factors. Weights between factors usingthe AHP analysis tool based on the mean values were calculated. Second, last 3 years between the industrial accidents statistics wereused to calculate the weights for each of the rating factors in the Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Grade weights between eachfactor which was based on the rating of each factor was calculated as the average of three years. Finally, the weights between eachfactor and the grade weights for each factor using the safety level of the enterprise were calculated so that you can evaluate theweighting.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (6)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0