메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives:Allergic rhinitis (AR) is commonly sub-classified into seasonal and perennial rhinitis. The recent “Allergic Rhinitis and its impact on Asthma (ARIA) Workshop” proposed to replace these terms by intermittent vs persistent AR. But the validity of this new classification is still largely unknown. Subjects and Method:Three hundred-eleven allergic rhinitis patients were included in this study. Patients were categorized into seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) groups, according to sensitized allergens. Twenty-eight items questionnaire filled out by patients were designed for this study. Based on the questionnaire, patients were classified into either intermittent or persistent AR. Patients information and associated factors were analysed between the groups. Results:Within the population with AR, 58% of the subjects had persistent AR. About 41% of the patients were classified as moderate-severe persistent AR. There was no association between the intermittent/persistent and the SAR/PAR classifications. Subjects with persistent AR had more severe symptoms, higher rate of self-awareness and had been previously diagnosed with AR. There were no significant difference in sensitization to allergens. However, grass, tree, house dust mite allergy is more common in persistent AR than in intermittent AR. More patients in Blockers and Mixed groups had persistent AR. Conclusion:A statistical comparison of the two classifications showed that they cannot be used interchangeably, as they do not represent the same stratum of disease. There is also an evidencethat the persistent type describes a distinct group with characteristics that differentiates them from intermittent AR. These results support the validity of the new ARIA classification as shown in other studies. (Korean J Otolaryngol 2006;49:623-8)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0