메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives Cervical lymph node metastasis is a very important prognostic factor of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Therefore, strict evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis is necessary for accurate staging and proper treatment planning. This study compares computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to position emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), and evaluates the clinical role of PET-CT in the diagnosis of cervical metastasis of HNSCC. Subjects and Method From October 2004 to September 2010, we studied 74 patients with HNSCC who underwent PET-CT, CT and MRI before undergoing neck dissection for the treatment of cervical lymph node metastasis. We compared pathologic results of 374 cervical lymph node levels in 74 patients with results of PET-CT, CT and MRI. We analyzed and compared sensitivity, specificity, predictability and accuracy of the three imaging methods. Results Among the 74 patients, 49 (66.2%) patients had positive cervical lymph node metastasis. Of the 374 cervical lymph node levels, 86 levels were confirmed to be positive lymph node metastasis. Sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT was 87.4% and 94.8% when the cut-off value of SUVmax was 1.855. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of PET-CT were higher than those of CT or MRI. Conclusion PET-CT is more effective than CT or MRI in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of HNSCC.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0