지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is generally observed that transitive constructions with inanimate subjects are not usually preferred either in English or Korean. However, Korean exhibits a much stronger nonpreference for those constructions than English. To account for this difference between English and Korean, Kim et al.(2009) resort to ‘animacy,’ whereas Jang(2009) employs ‘agentivity.’ However, since these concepts, ‘animacy’ and ‘agentivity,’ serve as primary factors in determining the subject of a transitive construction both in English and Korean, neither Kim et al.’s or Jang’s analysis effectively explains the strong tendency of avoiding inanimate subjects in Korean transitive constructions. In this context, we analyze both literary and nonliterary English-Korean translation data and discuss the strategies to avoid inanimate subjects in transitive sentences observed in the data. We attempt to account for this avoidance in terms of the difference in the ‘subject hierarchies’ of English and Korean
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0