메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한말연구학회 한말연구 한말연구 제50호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
231 - 258 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study attempt to investigate the pronunciation aspects of the /ㄴ ㄹ/ sequence in the neologism. To do this, a neologism list of /ㄴ ㄹ/ sequence was made and the list was from 『new word』 resource book by the National Institute of Korean language from 2000 to 2017. Then, a questionnaire survey was conducted to college students by using a neologism list. In previous studies, regressive lateralization and the application mechanism of nasalization have been explained in several ways. There are various explanations such as phonological perspectives, the differences of speaker perception about morphological separation possibility, analogy, differences in language consciousness between generations, expansion of nasalization language consciousness. Among the various mechanisms, morphological separability and analogy are examined to find out whether the previous mechanism in morphological separability and analogy applies to new language as well or not. An analysis of the surveys reveals several important points. First, it was found that the preference of nasalization was generally high according to morphological separation possibility based on affix classification. It is true that perception of form boundaries has some influence on the preference of nasalization and lateralization pronunciation. However, it is impossible to check whether language speakers recognize and pronounce separation possibility or not. In addition, existing headwords and new words were compared to see if the mechanism of 'analogy' applies equally to new words. As a result, there were some new words which had same pronunciation with headwords, but there were other cases which were not consistent with standard pronunciation of existing headwords although they had the same morphological construction. In other words, it is true that the mechanism of 'analogy' are influential, but it does not apply to every new word. The pedagogical implication of the present research is that it is a specialized study which new word was an object of study for lateralization and nasalization compared with previous researches that existing words were only studied. Some limitation was that voice data was not dealt with in this study, thus further research will be needed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0