메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국자료분석학회 Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society 제14권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
1,179 - 1,195 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examined whether the translation model (TM) which places emphasis on the modalities of stimuli and responses would be a valid model to explain the Stroop effect. In experiment 1, the Stroop effect was examined by using manual- and verbal-response Stroop tasks, respectively. In experiment 2, similar to the task used by Durgin (2003), target stimuli, distracters as well as response patches were displayed on the same screen and the Stroop effect was measured in terms of the mental modality representation of the responses verbally or nonverbally. The results of experiment 1, where response modalities were physically classified, showed that there were no significant differences in the Stroop effect due to the different response modalities, while experiment 2 showed an asymmetrical Stroop effect due to the response modalities. These results supported the prediction by the TM that a distracter stimulus does not cast an interference effect under conditions in which the target stimuli and responses are compatible in modality. Therefore, the findings offer evidence that the TM can be considered as a valid model for explaining the Stroop effect.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0