K-IFRS에 따른 자산재평가 기업의 재평가 전 이익조정에 관한 연구

김문현

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 김문현

저널정보: 한국기업경영학회 기업경영연구 기업경영연구 제19권 제1호

발행연도: 2012.1

수록면: 107 - 122 (16page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

본 연구에서는 자산재평가 전에 이익조정이 있었는지를 검증하고자 하였다. 재량적 유동발생액과 손실보고 여부를 이익조정의 측정치로 삼아 이를 재평가 전의 기간에 대해 재평가 기업과 비재평가 기업사이에 차이가 있는지를 비교하였다. 표본의 선정기간은 국제회계기준이 전면 시행되기 이전인 2008년 12월에 재평가가 허용된 이후 2009년～2010년이며, 유가증권시장에 소속된 12월 결산 제조기업으로 재평가를 실시한 기업 134개가 재평가 표본으로 선정되었다. 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 재량적 유동발생액으로 측정한 이익조정이 재평가 기업과 비재평가 기업이 다르지 않아, 이익조정이 재평가와 관련성이 없는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 재평가 기업에서 오히려 재평가 이전 손실보고 비중이 낮았다. 셋째, 재평가 기업만을 대상으로 한 분석에서는 재평가 2기 전의 재량적 발생액의 크기가 클수록 재평가차액 비중이 컸으며, 재평가 후 손실보고와 재평가차액 비중은 음(-)의 관계를 보였다. 대체로 본 연구의 실증 결과에 따르면 재평가 여부와 재평가 이전의 재량적 발생액 또는 손실보고와 무관한데 이는 자산재평가 전에 이익조정이 있었음을 의미하지 않는다. 재평가차액이 자산에서 차지하는 비중은재량적 발생액과 관련되어 있는데 이는 규모효과로 보인다. 이러한 결과는 최초 재평가 시점에서 인식되는 재평가잉여금이 순이익을 구성하지 않고 자본으로 인식된 후 해당 유형자산의 사용이나 처분에 따라 이익으로 실현되는 회계처리의 영향으로 판단된다

As K-GAAP adopted asset revaluation in 2008, many companies achieved the reduction effect of leverage ratio. For the purpose of improving financial structure. revaluation policy was adopted earlier than K-IFRS, which became obligatory in 2011. In total, 137 manufacturing firms announced the results of asset revaluation in 2009 and 2010. That is, among 770 manufacturing firms in Korean stock exchange market, about 17.7% companies carried out asset revaluation during this period. According to K-IFRS on asset revaluation, revaluation surplus is included in net asset. It is not certain, however, that revaluation has any effect on earnings now and in the future, because revaluation surplus is not recorded as components of net income. In addition, revaluation surplus is transferred to earning surplus only after the relevant assets are used or sold. Since revaluation surplus is deferred in this way, asset revaluation makes a difference in the reporting time of earnings. The purpose of this study is to test the relation between asset revaluation and earnings management prior to revaluation. It investigates whether asset revaluation is used for earnings management or not. The suggested hypothesis is that there will be no significant relation between asset revaluation and earnings management prior to revaluation. In other words, asset revaluation won't make any difference on the behavior of earnings management. To test the hypothesis, the behaviors of two groups, asset revaluation firms and non-revaluation firms, on earnings management, were compared. If the behaviors of two groups are not significantly different, it implies that there is no relation between asset revaluation and earnings management. For this purpose, this paper used discretionary current accounting accruals as a measure of earnings management. According to Dechow and Dichev (2002)ʼs current accounting accruals model, discretionary current accounting accruals was calculated by the degree of current accounting accruals not being realized into operating cash-flows, Then, discretionary current accounting accruals a year before revaluation. were compared between asset revaluation firms and non-revaluation firms. Discretionary current accounting accruals are considered to be decided by the CEOʼs discretion. In addition, loss reporting was compared between these two groups of firms. If firms are reluctant to report loss in general,loss reporting ratio will be significantly different between two groups. Test period is from 2009 to 2010. Revaluation samples are 134 firms, which were selected from public manufacturing firms. Asset revaluation firms must disclose revaluation-related information in-cluding revaluation date, objects, revaluation surplus, etc. Land, buildings, machinery was on the list of revaluation assets, of which land accounts for 91.3% (121 cases out of 134). Large portion of land is due to the fact that revaluation surplus effect of land is powerful than that of others, having a stronger impact on financial status. On the other hand, there were 23 cases of machinery, 20 cases of buildings, and 23 cases combined on the list of revaluation. The empirical results are as follows. First, there was no difference in discretionary current accruals for revaluation firms and non-revaluation firms. Earnings management measured by discretionary current accruals is not significantly different between two groups of firms, which means there was no earnings management prior to revaluation. Second, the ratio of loss reporting was higher in revaluation firms than in non-revaluation firms. It implies that loss-reporting firms are less likely to carry out revaluation. Thus, it is considered that not reporting loss is not the motivation of earnings management related to revaluation. Third, the analysis of revaluation firms shows that the larger discretionary current accruals are, the higher revaluation surplus ratio is, two years before revaluation. Revaluation surplus ratio was calculated by revaluation surplus divided by total asset. The results are considered to represent the size effect. Fourth, there was a negative relation between revaluation surplus ratio and loss ratio of non-revaluation firms. It represents that there is no relation between loss reporting and revaluation. The empirical results imply that there is no relation between asset revaluation and earnings management or loss reporting before revaluation. The firms which tend to manage earnings are not likely to try asset revaluation. As revaluation surplus is included in net asset, asset revaluation will not be used as a means of earnings management. Since this study investigated the first revaluation effect after adopting revaluation policy as K-IFRS, all sample firms reported revaluation surplus. If firms report revaluation loss afterwards, the results might be different. Revaluation loss is included as components of net income unlike revaluation surplus. If the similar examination is carried out on KOSDAK market, the results might be different as well. Further study on market reaction on revaluation will be required.

#이익조정 #자산재평가 #재평가잉여금 #재량적 유동발생액 #손실보고 #Earnings Management #Asset Revaluation #Revaluation Surplus #Discretionary Current Accounting Accruals #Loss Reporting.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

Dechow, P. D / 2002 / The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors / The Accounting Review 77 : 35 ~ 59

Guenther, D / 1994 / Measuring Earnings Management in Response to Corporate Tax Rate Changes: Evidence from the 1986 Tax Reform Act / The Accounting Review 69 : 230 ~ 243

Kasznik, R. / 1999 / On the Association Between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management / Journal of Accounting Research 37 : 57 ~ 821

Kreutzfeldt, R / 1986 / Error Characteristics in Audit Populations: Their Profiles and Relationships to Environmental Factor. Auditing / A Journal of Practice and Theory 6 :

Ohlson J. / 1995 / Earnings, Book value and dividends in equity valuation / Contemporary Accounting Research 11 : 661 ~ 667

이 논문의 저자 정보

김문현

소속기관

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 경영학

논문수 4 이용수 13

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (14)

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)