메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
99 - 132 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
A matrimonial breakdown is an inevitable phenomenon in human life. In the most countries, the divorce system which both spouse dissolve the marriage by their own will is granted, and the style of divorce is different depending on a time and country. Therefore the freedom of divorce as well as the freedom of marriage which belongs to human basic right is also guaranteed naturally. In the meantime, since the korean divorce law was established by the influence of western divorce law, the law of matrimonial breakdown has been improved from the Fault for Divorce which includes that the divorce is possible only in case of either responsibility or both‘s to the No-Fault for Divorce which includes that the divorce is permitted only with objective fact regardless the responsibility on the matrimonial breakdown. This tendency means that government intervention has been reduced about the divorce itself. This means that government changed the policy from which does not allow the dissolution of marriage easily because a marriage should be protected as a basic system of family-a standard unit of society, to which allows the dissolution of marriage reasonably because there is no meaning not allowing divorce when matrimonial relationship has no possibility of restoration. But a carrying-out the No-Fault for Divorce has a possibility causing a miserable result to the spouse who has no responsibility on the matrimonial breakdown. So there should be a full consideration for the spouse who is in a weak-side after divorce socially, economically, and also proper responsibility of a concerned person should be required. Government should intervene positively about the matters in relation with the result of divorce such as bringing-up children, support for the former spouse, parental rights,right of access, dividing the property to protect the socially weak person. In the meantime, a precedent excludes a divorce claim of a fault-spouse strictly, excluding some exceptions, to protect a marriage system and a supporting claim of socially weak spouse, so the reason of divorce in the present divorce law trial based on the Fault-for Divorce as a rule and also recognized the No-Fault for Divorce exceptionally. Under the assumption that the improvement of divorce law has reflected the change of social environment and consciousness, actual relationship between married couple is regarded more important than the law of marriage itself in the present society. And when considering the change and developing speed nowadays, a precedent about a divorce claim of a fault-spouse would be needed to correct someday. Though it is difficult to expect, when a fault-spouse claim divorce, the reason of divorce replaces the Fault for Divorce by the No-Fault for Divorce immediately considering the reality of our society and sense of law, the No-fault for Divorce will be increased definitely in the near future. After all, a matter concerning the divorce claim by guilty spouse and the principles of matrimonial breakdown should be understood in view of the world-wide, common, and general increase of human right awareness and existence of human right concept, should be discussed under the assumption that a value which is aimed and admitted generally in human society should be accepted and reflected to a certain extent.
#유책주의 #파탄주의 #유책배우자의 이혼청구권 #협의상 이혼 #재판상 이혼 #Divorce Claim by Guilty Spouse #Indissolubility of Marriage #Principles of Matrimonial Breakdown #No #Non)-Fault for Divorce #Fault for Divorce #Dissolution of Marriage

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (46)

참고문헌 신청
Harry D. Krause / 1986 / Family Law(In A Nutshell Series), 2nd. Ed / WestPublishing Co google schola Harry D. Krause / 2003 / Family Law(West Nutshell Series), 4th. Ed / Thomson West google schola John Eekelaar / 2006 / Family Law and Personal Life / Oxford University Press google schola Nigel Lowe?Gillian Douglas / 2007 / Bromley' Family Law, Tenth Edition / OxfordUniversity Press google schola Susan B. Boyd / 2006 / Law and Families / Ashgate google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0