지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is about the judgment of determining the need formodification of an indictment theories and the criteria for the judgment ofdetermining the need for modification for studied.
Truth discovery and substantive modification of an indictment theauthority to impose penalties the country, and at the same time to enableproper exercise of the accused can guarantee defense of the rightsinstitution.
Thus, the court can modification of modification of reason modificationof an indictment occurs, the public prosecutor require. The public prosecutormust apply for modification of an indictment.
An indictment should be changed in any case for the opposition to havea different theory. Most importantly, the public prosecutor receive anindictment want to judge described the defendant appeals the fact itself.
In this sense, the theory is reasonable to mention the fact. SupremeCourt follows this theory. In fact, according to the change of these claims,and the fact that the defendant's defense of the changes result in asubstantial penalty if the concern is that should the need modification of an indictment.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0