메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제34권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
5 - 40 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
So-called ‘open primary’ has been a hotly discussed topic in Korea recent years. Though politicians in both sides have been talked about the open primary, there has never been serious concern of its possible conflict with the political party’s right for the self-determination and self-regulation which is guaranteed by the Constitution. This article analyzes the origin and development of primary election system of the United States with special emphasis on the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Primary replaced the caucus as a mechanism to select parties’ candidate during late 1890’s and early 1900’s. Most states adopted ‘closed primary’, and later many states adopted ‘open primary’. Some states, notably the State of Washington adopted ‘blanket primary’ which allows people to vote for any body in any party. As blanket primary permits so-called ‘split vote’ and ‘cross-voting, it raised controversies. Political parties argued the blanket primary violates their rights of association guaranteed by the First Amendment of U.S. Constitution. The State of California later adopted the blanket primary only to be declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000. After the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the State of Washington changed its primary system to ‘top two primary’ which has been first invented by the State of Lousiana. The U.S. Supreme Court decided the new kind of non-partisan primary as constitutional in 2008. Then the State of California adopted the top two primary in 2010 which will be used from the election of 2012. The State of Louisina also decided to use this system again in 2010. This is a very interesting phenomenon in the U.S. primary system. The articles concludes that ‘top two primary’ is very ideal for Korea as the system is non-partisan and run by the government. It is especially meaningful as a tool to curtail the parties’ bosses’ undue influence which is a major problem in Korean politics.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0