지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Arrest accompanied by the introduction of a voluntary goal to attract, including for the protection and the fight against illegal investigative practices and procedures to ensure the investigation. Arrest system is distinguished from the arrest, has the legitimacy of the purpose, procedures will also be distinguished from confinement.
However, due to the arrest warrant documents the human rights of the accused actually does not help. Hearing the trial of legal claims of infringement of protected areas can be seen that. To solve this problem to determine whether the arrest of a legal trial must be held to be switched. Go before a judge immediately after arrest without a warrant of arrest and confinement of the trial, whether due at the same time criticized as unconstitutional if the arrest warrant and of complexity of the procedure can be free from criticism. The real guarantee of human rights and the legal right to be heard will be. The human rights of the accused and the court's work overload, and when you consider the promptness of the investigation within 24 hours of being issued an arrest warrant that is right. Warrantless arrest for a non-spiritual and material damage suffered by the accused filed a civil suit for damages would have received as well as the integration of human rights procedures, including attorney's fees, considering the economic aspects of compensation for the accused in criminal proceedings system should be established.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0