메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제27호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
11 - 34 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study examined two types of integrated tasks (reading-writing and listening-writing) by comparing them with the independent (writing-only) task to probe into two questions: (1) whether performance on the integrated tasks differs from that on the independent task, and (2) how reading and listening skills are respectively associated with performance on integrated tasks. Three types of writing (144 written pieces) by advanced-level participants were scored by two raters using an analytical scoring rubric. The data, both overall and analytical scores, were analyzed by ANOVAs, and linear regression analyses were conducted between integrated task and proficiency (RC and LC) scores. The results showed that there was a significant difference between writing-only and listening-writing tasks, but not between writing-only and reading-writing tasks. Furthermore, the participants significantly performed better on writing-only than on listening-writing tasks in terms of content, and reading-writing tasks outperformed listening-writing tasks in vocabulary and expression. The findings suggest that integrated writing tasks elicit not only multiple language skills but also complex cognitive skills. The study also indicates that listening proficiency is a strong predictor of performance on the listening-writing integrated task, whereas reading proficiency may not have a predictive value. Pedagogical implications based on the findings were discussed with respect to how to prepare students for integrated writing tasks.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0