메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 러시아연구소 슬라브硏究 슬라브硏究 제27권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
91 - 119 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
During Soviet Times, academic historians were obliged to focus exclusively on the grand forces of history, so that few biographies of Russian intellectual figures were authored. Over the past several years, the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction: Russian historians have increasingly concentrated on intellectual biography. This article surveys intellectual biographies recently offered by several leading St. Petersburg historians. Each one of these books highlights a St. Petersburg, anti-Bolshevik intellectual, who, although famous in his own time, is largely forgotten today. This topic is important because Fin-de-Siècle St. Petersburg became an intellectual cauldron, a new Athens. It was in many ways the first “post-modern city.” Its peculiar brand of modernity went on to shape our world. Unfortunately, the works reviewed here have not been widely circulated; they are available only within Russia or at major research libraries. As a consequence, they have received few reviews. In recent years, St. Petersburg historians have created a unique portrait of Russian intellectual history which is distinct from the approach favored by western scholars. Firstly, they have focused their efforts on archival research, often upplemented by the reminiscences of relatives and direct acquaintances. As opposed to their illustrious heirs, Kliuchevsky and Pokrovsky, today’s historians of St. Petersburg refuse to draw grand schemes. Secondly, by rejecting crude caricatures of “Russian” thought, they are able to better confront issues of nationality and modernity. As the works reviewed in this article well show, intellectuals in the Empire’s capital struggled with the concept of “oriental.” Out of heterogeneous cultural traditions, they strove to forge Jewish, krainian, and Belorussian identities in the context of—but distinct from—a “Russian” Empire.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0