메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
아주대학교 법학연구소 아주법학 아주법학 제6권 제1호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
345 - 400 (56page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this article, I did a research on the ‘Illicit Goods(贓)’ of Joseon Dynasty that has both concepts of Illicit goods and bribes in modern criminal justice system. The Illicit Goods of Joseon Dynasty meant all property related to all types of illegal conduct, such as the property acquired through theft, the property used in criminal transactions, and the prohibited property. But the property acquired through theft in the Art. 287 ‘Supervisors or Custodians Themselves Stealing Money or Grain from Granaries or Treasuries’ of the Great Ming Code was categorized as bribes taken by officers in Joseon Dynasty. So a bribery case was called as Jang-o(贓汚) and a theft case was called as Jang-do(贓盜) in Joseon Dynasty. I looked into substantial provisions on the Six Illicit Goods to illuminate the concept of them. I found out that the concept of Six Illicit Goods focuses on punishment proportionate to the quantity of the Illicit Goods. Thus calculation of the Illicit Goods was so important since punishment was determined by the amount of the Illicit Goods. The calculation method of the Illicit Goods was based upon the principle of the Most Serious Crime that was stipulated in Art. 25. ‘Sentencing on the Basis of the Punishment for the More Serious Crime When Two Crimes Are Discovered Together’ of the Great Ming Code. The calculation method of the Great Ming Code was clearer and simpler than that of the Tang Code.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0