메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제6권 제3호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
199 - 217 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In May of 2009, the Supreme Court of Korea gave a landmark decision granting a dying patient the right to remove the respirator from her body. It was the first case in Korea for the Supreme Court to explicitly approve withdrawal of life-sustaining medical support from the patient with no hope of recovery but still alive. However, hardly any attention has been paid by the Supreme Court, or at least by the majority opinion of its decision, to the on-going debate on the varied themes under the heading of the end-of-life decision making. And it can be said that for physicians as well as commentators the end-of-life decision making is still a blur. This paper aims at reviewing briefly the problem of end-of-life decision making in recent articles published in Korea. Firstly, the legal background and battle over the case of a dying patient whom we may call Ms. Kim, which ended up with three court decisions in her favour, will be reviewed to somewhat detailed extent. Secondly, some critical analyses of the court decisions conducted by commentators in law and medical ethics will be addressed. And lastly, the social and political influence of the landmark decision and the tasks yet to be carried out even after the decision was delivered will also be summarized.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0