메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제5권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
1 - 29 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Comparative administrative law has not been a major subject in traditional comparative law. But now we can find the interests in comparative administrative law among administrative law scholars in United State. The book of Comparative Administrative Law edited by Susan Rose‐Ackerman and Peter L.Lindseth was published in 2010. Some scholars like Professor John Ohnesorge(Wisconsin University) and Professor Tom Ginsburg (Chicago University) are studying administrative law of Japan, Korea and China. USAID is giving legal assistance of administrative law to China. Among them, the approach by Tom Ginsburg is very interesting because his object is not to compare Asian administrative law with American and European administrative law, but one Asian administrative law with another Asian administrative law. He tried the comparison between Japanese administrative procedure law (enacted in 1993) and Korean one (in 1996). He concluded that Korean administrative procedure law brought about the reform because it provided for the mechanism where the court can discipline the bureaucracy. On the contrary, Japanese administrative law preserved status quo. So it did not change the Japanese administrative law and administrative system. He pointed out the party system and political situation as the cause of such divergence with reference to principal‐agent theory. As Professor Tom Ginsburg emphasized, Japanese administrative reform did not contribute to make stronger external control by the courts to the bureaucracy as Korean administrative law reform did. But we can call it another type of reform, not simple preservation of status quo. It aimed at a change of internal relation within the relationship of the politics – the bureaucracy and self‐control within the bureaucracy. Anyway we admitted the divergence between the almost same systems at starting points.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0