메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한골대사학회 대한골대사학회지 대한골대사학회지 제21권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
21 - 28 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Advocacy for the use of calcium supplements arose at a time when there were no othereffective interventions for the prevention of osteoporosis. Their promotion was basedon the belief that increasing calcium intake would increase bone formation. Our currentunderstandings of the biology of bone suggest that this does not occur, though calciumdoes act as a weak antiresorptive. Thus, it slows postmenopausal bone loss but, despitethis, recent meta-analyses suggest no significant prevention of fractures. In sum, there islittle substantive evidence of benefit to bone health from the use of calcium supple-ments. Against this needs to be balanced the likelihood that calcium supplement use in-creases cardiovascular events, kidney stones, gastrointestinal symptoms, and admis-sions to hospital with acute gastrointestinal problems. Thus, the balance of risk and ben-efit seems to be consistently negative. As a result, current recommendations are to ob-tain calcium from the diet in preference to supplements. Dietary calcium intake has notbeen associated with the adverse effects associated with supplements, probably be-cause calcium is provided in smaller boluses, which are absorbed more slowly since theycome together with quantities of protein and fat, resulting in a slower gastric transittime. These findings suggest that calcium supplements have little role to play in themodern therapeutics of osteoporosis, which is based around the targeting of safe andeffective anti-resorptive drugs to individuals demonstrated to be at increased risk of fu-ture fractures.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0