메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한소아응급의학회 대한소아응급의학회지 대한소아응급의학회지 제5권 제1호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
13 - 18 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: To investigate caregivers’ preference regarding fever management in the emergency department. Methods: Between July 2011 and June 2014, we surveyed the preference in fever management by caregivers of febrile children aged 7 years or younger who visited the emergency department. The questionnaire consisted of the characteristics of the children and their caregivers, usefulness of tepid massage, and the caregivers’ preference in fever management, in particular the combination of methods and the doses of antipyretics. Results: Among a total of 161 children, 161 were enrolled in the study, with the mean age of 5.0 years. Of the caregivers, 64.6% were in their 30s and 50.9% were parents, and 70.2% and 24.2% reported that tepid massage was “very useful” and “a little useful,” respectively. The most preferred combination of methods was “tepid massage, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen (50.9%; P < 0.001).” “Tepid massage and ibuprofen” was preferred to “tepid massage and acetaminophen (24.2% vs 7.5%).” The most preferred dose of antipyretics was 1 mL/kg/day (divided into 3 doses; 60.2%; P = 0.012), followed by 1 mL/kg/day (divided into 3 doses) plus 2 mL/dose (29.1%). Conclusion: Caregivers may recognize tepid massage as a useful fever management. The most preferred fever management was the combination of tepid massage, acetaminophen, and ibuprofen with a dose of 1 mL/kg/day.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (10)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0