메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이중언어학회 이중언어학 이중언어학 제50호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
47 - 78 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to examine the validity on standards of classification for questions which were proposed by Long & Sato(1983). According to Long & Sato (1983), referential questions are asked to get information from students(which implies a teacher doesn’t know a student’s answer), and display questions(evaluative question) are asked to establish the student’s knowledge of an answer.(which implies a teacher already knows the correct answer.) To examine these standards, I analyze the frame of classroom conversations. The analysis shows that a frame shift from a general classroom conversation frame to a dramatization frame occurs often. Dramatization frame is used to make the conversation between teacher and student as a scene, thus creating a pedagogical theme. In dramatization frame, teacher and student have a conversation as a real self and they have a dramaturgical role in the scene at the same time. In dramatization frame, a teacher doesn’t know a students’answer and the teacher expects proper answers fitted into the scene. In dramatization frame, teacher’s questions cannot be categorized as referential questions but also display questions. It implies that the line between referential questions and display questions is blurred. The results of this study can contribute to set new standards of classification for questions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0