메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제22권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
497 - 528 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The goal of this paper is to make some critical remarks on the unified approach to obligatory control (OC) and a couple of other apparently similar constructions in Korean. OC has received various accounts in the generative literature. Arguing against the previous approaches such as the binding-theoretic approach (Chomsky (1981)) and null Case approach (e.g., Chomsky and Lasnik (1993)), some studies have proposed to reduce OC dependencies into A-chain relations, getting rid of the control module (e.g., Hornstein (1999, 2001, 2003)). This line of analysis, dubbed the 'Movement Theory of Control' (MTC), has expanded their empirical coverage, arguing that OC into both infinitival and finite complements can be explained under the movement view (e.g., Boeckx et al. (2010)). Their claim has been extended by H. Lee (2011) to various Korean data,which range from OC into infinitival and jussive complements to raising constructions. Furthermore, she examines the possibility of applying the movement view to long-distance scrambling (LDS). This paper shows that although the MTC has some advantages in analyzing Korean infinitival OC constructions, the attempt to unify all the aforementioned phenomena under the movement view would run into empirical and theoretical problems. It is rather concluded that at least OC into jussive complements and LDS should be dealt with in different ways.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0