지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Resultatives in English must be predicated of the culmination event, and as such, they are typically added to lexical accomplishments for which the culmination is lexically specified (e.g., John painted the house red). Interestingly, they are added to activity verbs lacking a culmination. For such cases, resultative predication triggers an aspectual shift from activity to accomplishment reading through imposing a culmination to these activity verbs (e.g., John hammered the metal flat; John sang the baby asleep). In this study, this type of resultative is called a derived resultative as opposed to a typical lexical resultative. Derived resultatives in Korean, in particular ones with intransitive activities, differ from their English counterparts to the extent that they are bi-clausal, have nominative Case-marked resultative subjects, and do not entail the result state. Given this background, the aim of this study was to examine whether Korean speakers are able to acquire derived resultatives in English, showing their sensitivity to aspectual shift therein. A further aim of the study was to explore sources that Korean speakers draw on in such an acquisition process. The results showed that Korean speakers do know derived resultatives in English and the resultant state interpretation associated with the constructions. This result indicates that they detected the aspectual shift, linking telic accomplishment reading to originally atelic activity verbs. We have argued that L1 transfer, prototypicality, and structural congruence contribute to such a pattern. This study has also explored the implication of the syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis in relation to the role of structural congruence.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Split Analysis of Korean Transitive Resultative Constructions
언어학 연구
2020 .01
-
A Clausal Analysis of Resultative Constructions with X-key: Evidence from Corpus and Experiments
언어와 정보사회
2018 .01
-
形容词的动态性与现代汉语VA动结式的能产性
중국언어연구
2024 .02
-
Judgement of Telicity in English Resultative Constructions by Korean Learners of English
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
러시아어 작문･번역 교육을 위한 러시아어-한국어 결과 구문 비교 연구
Foreign Languages Education
2016 .01
-
영어의 결과구문 특성과 한국인의 이해도
영어교과교육
2016 .01
-
한국어 상 체계와 결과상의 유형 - 2차 상태의 내적 국면을 나타내는 비완망상 -
언어와 정보사회
2016 .11
-
A Usage-based Analysis of L2 Production of English Resultative Constructions
어학연구
2019 .04
-
An Experimental Study of Resultative Constructions with X-key
언어학 연구
2018 .10
-
Korean Resultative Construction Redux
언어연구
2022 .08
-
Three Types of the Intransitive Resultative Construction in English: A Generative Account
영어학
2023 .01
-
On the Typology of Small Clauses: Null Subject and Mode of Merge in Resultatives
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
The Pseudo-resultative [V-ko (iss-)] Construction in Korean
어학연구
2018 .08
-
L2 영어 학습자의 결과구문 생성의 용법기반 분석(Usage-based Analysis): 한국인 예비대학생 작문 코퍼스 분석을 중심으로
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
-
A Corpus-based Cognitive Grammar Analysis of English Resultative Construction
새한영어영문학
2021 .08
-
A Corpus-based Comparison of the Use of English Resultative Constructions between Chinese English Learners and Native English Speakers
영어교육연구
2021 .09
-
‘-고 있다‘ 결과 구문의 도출
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
The Syntactic Status of Resultatives and the Direct Object Restriction
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
An Experimental Study of Yeo (2006, 2011): -Key/-Tolok Alternation of Resultative Constructions in Korean
언어정보
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0