메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제41호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
29 - 50 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper is focused on the dilemma of free will as it is interpreted by Dostoevsky and Neuroscience. Dostoevsky's novel Notes from Underground has been regarded as an explicit polemic with Chernyshevsky's rationalism and determinism. Dostoevsky's polemic against determinism foreshadows today's free will debate in neuroscience in that Dostoevsky's Underground Man and modern day neuroscientist cannot avoid dilemma. The Underground Man thinks that man has free will and he can do anything against his own benefit just in order to prove that he is free and he is not regulated by the law of nature. However, in actuality his life proceeds as if he is guided by some invisible power and all his effort to prove the existence of free will ends up with total mental bankruptcy. Similarly, today's neuroscientists like to assert that there is no free will, but their assertion is far from solving the free will debate. The scientist Benjamin Libet showed in an experiment on human consciousness that unconscious processes in the brain precedes the initiation of conscious action based on free will. If this is true, there arises the problem of responsibility. If human condition is genetically determined, no one is responsible for anything. For this reason, many neuroscientists are still in some midway between determinism and free will in spite of Libet experiment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0