메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
111 - 152 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As corporations grew through the 1970s and shareholding was divided among more widely dispersed shareholders in the U.S., CEOs, rather than shareholders, began to choose the board members. The CEO is able to run the daily operations of the firm and could recommend nominees to the board, after an increasing number of firms have failed to have a controlling shareholder. It is the managers who heavily influence the nominating process and cause the selection of board members in their own, and control over the nominating process machinery. The result of that change is that the board is effectively inferior to the CEO it is supposed to supervise. Modern corporate law of the U.S. has settled on a notion of a monitoring board. That means that the board has the ability to monitor management and maximize shareholder wealth. The monitoring function is described as the function which is at the heart of the agency cost model of the firm, because it identifies the central role for the board, necessary in light of managers' temptation to shirk or to act opportunistically. A monitoring board is composed mostly of independent directors, who don't have close personal or financial relations to the firm. But the independent directors are neither necessarily socially independent from management nor unsympathetic to the concerns of senior officers. The board's role become advisory at best rather than supervisory. One of the criticisms of the mandatory independent board of the U.S. is that it applies to all companies, regardless of the idiosyncratic needs or preference of a particular business type. There exists a need for improved corporate governance in the U.S. It is proposed an opinion that companies would be required to comply with the rules, or explain in their SEC filings why they have chosen not to do so. The dual board structure which would be composed of business review board and conflicts board is also proposed as an alternative of monitoring board by some scholars. The other opinion proposes an investor board, which would be a board of directors made up of representatives of various corporate constituents, including shareholders, creditors and senior managers. It is necessary to consider the improvement of independent board in Korea.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0