지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Form requirements particularly for arbitration clauses are widely perceived as an obstacle for efficiently resolving disputes on an international level. The paper discusses the recent suggestion that the freedom of form principle under Art. 11 CISG extended to arbitration, forum selection, or choice of law clauses in international sales contracts and thus superseded any and all formal requirements in this regard.
After analysing national and international form requirements with regard to said clauses, the authors elaborate that while dispute clauses are indeed encompassed by the CISG’s scope of application, freedom of form under the CISG was neither intended to nor should it apply to dispute clauses. This result is further confirmed by the interplay of the CISG with other international conventions, first and foremost the 1958 New York Convention, as well as a careful analysis of the so called most‐favourable‐law‐approach.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
Berger, Bernhard / 2010 / International Arbitration in Switzerland / Sweet&Maxwell
Born, Gary / 2009 / International Commercial Arbitration / Kluwer
Cairns, David J. A / 2004 / Spain’s New Arbitration Act / ASA?Bulletin 22
Dolle, Hans / 1976 / Kommentar zum Einheitlichen Kaufrecht / Beck
Flechtner, Harry M / 2003 / American Procedure and CISG Substance in a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal / Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration
Born, Gary / 2009 / International Commercial Arbitration / Kluwer
Cairns, David J. A / 2004 / Spain’s New Arbitration Act / ASA?Bulletin 22
Dolle, Hans / 1976 / Kommentar zum Einheitlichen Kaufrecht / Beck
Flechtner, Harry M / 2003 / American Procedure and CISG Substance in a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal / Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0