메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국원자력학회 Nuclear Engineering and Technology Nuclear Engineering and Technology 제47권 제7호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
939 - 944 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The calibration methods of neutron-measuring devices such as the neutron survey meterhave advantages and disadvantages. To compare the calibration factors obtained by theshadow cone method and semi-empirical method, 10 neutron survey meters of fivedifferent types were used in this study. This experiment was performed at the KoreaAtomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI; Daejeon, South Korea), and the calibrationneutron fields were constructed using a 252Californium (252Cf) neutron source, which waspositioned in the center of the neutron irradiation room. The neutron spectra of the calibrationneutron fields were measured by a europium-activated lithium iodide scintillator incombination with KAERI's Bonner sphere system. When the shadow cone method wasused, 10 single moderator-based survey meters exhibited a smaller calibration factor by asmuch as 3.1e9.3% than that of the semi-empirical method. This finding indicates thatneutron survey meters underestimated the scattered neutrons and attenuated neutrons(i.e., the total scatter corrections). This underestimation of the calibration factor wasattributed to the fact that single moderator-based survey meters have an under-ambientdose equivalent response in the thermal or thermal-dominant neutron field. As a result,when the shadow cone method is used for a single moderator-based survey meter, anadditional correction and the International Organization for Standardization standard8529-2 for room-scattered neutrons should be considered.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0