메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국전문물리치료학회 한국전문물리치료학회지 한국전문물리치료학회지 제3권 제2호
발행연도
1996.1
수록면
49 - 54 (6page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purposes of this study were to measure skin temperature and blood flow onthe contralateral upper extremity when heat is applied to one upper extremity, wereto compare the effect of contrast bath. The subjects were 38 healthy adults withno history of peripheral vascular disease. The subjects of contrast bath were 18persons and the subjects of warm bath were 20 persons. The subjects of onegroup were seated with their right arm in water(42'C) up to the mid-forearm. Thesubjects of the other group were seated with their right arm up to themid-forearm in water which was changed from warm to cold using the contrastbath technique. The continually changing temperatures and blood flow weremeasured by an independent observer at intervals of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutesrespectively after the start of the procedure. The resu1ts were as follows. Thetemperature of the warm bath group rose 4.28% over the pre-experimentaltemperatures and the temperature of the contrast bath group rose 3.41%. Therewas no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The blood flowof the warm bath group rose 8.31% over the pre-experimental blood flow and theblood flow of the contrast bath group rose 17.24%. There was a statisticallysignificant between the two groups 20 minutes after the start of the procedure. Thus the contrast bath is a more effective method than the warm bath to increaseblood flow.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0