메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
157 - 179 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
One of the controversies associated with grammar teaching is whether we need to use the grammatical terms while teaching grammar or not. This study aims at examining such controversies in the situation of Korean as foreign language education. To do this, research is conducted on the effect of teacher’s using grammatical terminology in classroom on the ability to use Korean particle, proficiency in Korean and the knowledge of grammatical terms. In the experiment two Korean teacher taught elementary Korean to 12 multinational exchange students of one university in Korea for 3 weeks using grammatical terminology. Learners were tested TOPIK, grammatical terminology knowledge test, a sentence completing test before and after experimental class to analyze the relationship between test scores. Analysis results are summarized as follows: 1) the relationship between grammatical terminology knowledge test and a sentence completing test was closer than the relationship between the different tests. 2) after 3 weeks of classes sentence completing test scores are most improved. This means that using the terms such as ‘subject’, ‘object’, ‘particle’, ‘ending’, ‘connective ending’ helpful for students to identify and use Korean particle. 3) To use grammatical terminology during the three weeks of classes did not affect the proficiency in Korean. (Korea University)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0