메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제22권 제2호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
75 - 111 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this quasi-experimental study we attempted to determine the relation between universal typology and learnability as claimed in NPAH. In particular, we tried to determine which of the two hypotheses, Markedness generalization hypothesis & Learnability hypothesis, which are considered important in SLA with respect to learnability, provides more appropriate explanation about the developmental stages of Korean RCs. And we investigated what are more effective teaching techniques in comprehending and producing Korean RCs. For this, we compared the effects between the input‐based teaching method(esp. Processing Instruction: PI) and the meaning based output‐based teaching method(MOI). Results of sentence combination tests & picture selection tests showed that participants were able to generalize rules for other RCs types(SU, OBL), though they received an instruction focused on the structure of DO, a relatively unmarked structure, that they had not been taught. And as for the effect of teaching on RCs, PI and MOI methods are effective in increasing the rate of acquisition of Korean RCs. However, the results of comparison between PI and MOI showed that there are no statistically significant differences. However, given that the PI group who participated only in input activities, we found that PI is a very effective teaching technique not only in understanding target structures but also in producing them.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0