지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper explores the semantic, pragmatic function and syntax of an interrogative ‘where’ in Korean and in Chinese. It aims to examine the similarities and differences of the interrogative ‘where’ between Korean and Chinese. This findings suggest that both ‘어디’ in Korean and ‘nar/nali’ in Chinese have interrogative usage which contribute to compose interrogative sentence. Furthermore both of them have non-interrogative usage as virtual reference, indefinite reference and rhetoric question, and they have a high level of corresponding relationship. However, ‘어디’ and ‘nar/nali’ have no corresponding relationship in the implication of extents. The findings further suggest that ‘어디’ in Korean have exclamatory usage which can be translated into ‘heng, o, en’ and so on in Chinese. ‘nar/nali’ in Chinese have negative reference which can be translated as ‘별말씀을요.’ ‘무슨 말씀이에요.’ ‘그건 무슨 말씀이에요’ in Korean. Both ‘어디’ and ‘nar/nali’ are widely used in a declarative sentence, an interrogative sentence and an imperative sentence. In addition, they can serve as subject, object, attribute, adverbial and independent word in a sentence. ‘어디’ can serve as predicate, while ‘nar/nali’ cannot
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0