지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제113호
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 85 - 122 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2019.09.113.85
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1919, the March 1st movement began in Seoul and Pyeong’yang, and then spreaded to other regions throughout the Gyeong’gi-do province as well. The aim of this article is to examine the Japanese colonial authorities’ response and oppression of the movement, through cases of individual areas of the time. In the Gyeong’gi-do province, the Colonial authorities mobilized not only the Military Police and ordinary civil Police force, but also a so-called Self-defense squad (called “Ja’wi-dan”) composed of Japanese individuals who were living in Joseon at the time as well, in order to forcibly and effectively suppress the protesters. Colonial authorities also organized Inspection units (named “Sachal-ban”) to monitor public opinions of the Korean population, situation surrounding the religious sects, and foreign missionaries’ operations currently underway in Joseon.
Coming into April, the Joseon Governor General office began to organize Self-defense squads with not only Japanese but also influential Korean figures known throughout the country. These Korean squad members were instructed to appease the Korean public and weaken the Manse protests in the process. Since April 13th, in the Gyeong’gi-do province, such Korean squads were organized in Su’weon-gun, Jin’wi-gun, Anseong-gun, Gang’hwa-gun and Go’yang-gun. The colonial authorities in Gyeong’gi-do also selected one or two local influentials from each of the Gun(郡) units, and assigned them to the task same as that of the squads. This shows us the fact that the colonial authorities’ method was shifting from ‘ex-post facto suppression’ from aggressive ‘beforehand prevention.’
Meanwhile, the Governor(Jang’gwan) of the Gyeong’gi-do province requested the Japanese army be dispatched, so the 78th and 79th Regiments began sending over 830 troops to 26 areas inside Gyeong’gi-do. In order to intimidate the Korean public, the Japanese army would march down the street or conduct large-scale inspections in areas heavily populated by Koreans. Since March through June, there were over 60 cases of armed suppression in Gyeong’gi-do alone, and from at least 6,000 to 19,700 Korean souls were either injured, killed or arrested by the Japanese colonial authorities. The Provost Martial and Police Commissioner of the Gyeong’gi-do province requested that the police force in the area not be reduced, arguing that ‘The longing for independence embedded in their[the Joseon people] minds would never go away.’
Coming into April, the Joseon Governor General office began to organize Self-defense squads with not only Japanese but also influential Korean figures known throughout the country. These Korean squad members were instructed to appease the Korean public and weaken the Manse protests in the process. Since April 13th, in the Gyeong’gi-do province, such Korean squads were organized in Su’weon-gun, Jin’wi-gun, Anseong-gun, Gang’hwa-gun and Go’yang-gun. The colonial authorities in Gyeong’gi-do also selected one or two local influentials from each of the Gun(郡) units, and assigned them to the task same as that of the squads. This shows us the fact that the colonial authorities’ method was shifting from ‘ex-post facto suppression’ from aggressive ‘beforehand prevention.’
Meanwhile, the Governor(Jang’gwan) of the Gyeong’gi-do province requested the Japanese army be dispatched, so the 78th and 79th Regiments began sending over 830 troops to 26 areas inside Gyeong’gi-do. In order to intimidate the Korean public, the Japanese army would march down the street or conduct large-scale inspections in areas heavily populated by Koreans. Since March through June, there were over 60 cases of armed suppression in Gyeong’gi-do alone, and from at least 6,000 to 19,700 Korean souls were either injured, killed or arrested by the Japanese colonial authorities. The Provost Martial and Police Commissioner of the Gyeong’gi-do province requested that the police force in the area not be reduced, arguing that ‘The longing for independence embedded in their[the Joseon people] minds would never go away.’
목차
머리말
1. 군경(軍警)의 배치와 무력동원
2. 회유와 위협
3. 탄압 현황과 실상
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
경기·인천 지역 3·1운동 판결과 정치적 함의
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
경기·인천지역 만세시위의 확산 양상
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
만세시위의 다원적 의미와 지속되는 지역공동체 - 안성군 3.1운동의 새로운 이해 -
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
『주역』 ｢진괘(震卦)｣에 담긴 경 사상 연구
동서철학연구
2020 .01
-
중국-EU-미국 간 지리적 표시 보호제도에 대한 글로벌 분쟁 및 중국의 시사점
민족연구
2019 .01
-
왕화(王化)와 풍속(風俗)의 변주 - 조선시대 경기도 읍지 풍속 기술을 중심으로 -
기전문화연구
2023 .06
-
가칭 《경기역사지도집》의 체재 구성과 편찬을 위한 시론
기전문화연구
2017 .01
-
전통사회 경북지역 맹인 독경 연구
실천민속학연구
2021 .08
-
京畿道 지역의 地名 연구 : 風水 形局論에 따른 有緣性을 중심으로
어문론집
2017 .03
-
아동문학가 박고경 연구
아동청소년문학연구
2019 .12
-
3·1운동기 인천지역 시위의 양상과 특징
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
수원 만세시위의 양상과 특징
역사와현실
2019 .09
-
필기와 전기의 거리
고전과 해석
2017 .01
-
柳宗悦の朝鮮理解の特質 ―朝鮮関連初期の著作を手がかりに―
일본문화학보
2020 .11
-
조선 후기 전기소설 국문본의 종합적 고찰 - 문헌학적 특징 및 번역과 개작의 양상을 중심으로 -
돈암어문학
2021 .06
-
1920년대 조선의 군제(郡制) 논의와 조선총독부의 ‘군도제(郡島制)’ 구상
역사와현실
2025 .03
-
『전경』 「행록」편 연구
대순사상논총
2019 .01
-
퇴계 경(敬) 사상에 대한 칸트 선험윤리적 해석
유학연구
2024 .02
-
주시경이 바라본 국어
언어사실과 관점
2015 .01
-
근대 만주지역 일본영사관의 조선인경찰채용정책
일본문화연구
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0