지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제24호
- 발행연도
- 2018.7
- 수록면
- 109 - 142 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2018.07.24.109
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the beginning of its history, trade union has made its continuous advance toward the goal of political empowerment. In other words, the entity of trade union necessarily involves political features and functions and such makes trade union impossible to repudiate itself from the political actions. However, the Establishment of society has never have felt comfortable with such political empowerment of trade union and has unceasingly tried to introduce legislative grounds to control and restrict it. Korean lawmakers as well implemented legal control and restriction over (ⅰ) the political actions such as election campaign and political funding, (ⅱ) the amount of union dues, (ⅲ) the legal capacity of union executives, (ⅳ) the intervention of third parties, and (ⅴ) the finance and general management. The law makers also have introduced and maintained the (ⅵ) dissolution order to trade union for a long time.
Each item of restriction above may seem remote or unconnected to one another at a glance. However, when we study some concrete intentions expressed during the process of the legislation, it is hard to miss that the lawmakers have looked at trade union with deep distrust. In particular, it is believed that lawmakers used to think that ‘trade union will surely be contaminated by impure forces and eventually fail to fulfill its inherent functions if not put under relevant restrictions’. Accordingly, lawmakers have built up some supervisory and restrictive measures on trade union in the name of its political neutrality or democratic operation. Under the influence of such restrictive measures, trade union had to undergo many difficulties in making its advance toward the political empowerment throughout the history of labor law.
The restrictive measures above have gradually been abolished since the June Movement in 1987 and the enactment of Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act in 1997. Thus, considerable portion of the restrictive mechanism is no longer functional as of now. However, due to the inertia of former legislations that have applied for few decades, the political actions and political empowerment of trade union are still considered taboos in Korean society. However, the advance of trade union to the political fields is believed to be a consistent flow. And restrictive legislations on the political actions of trade union do not seem to be ultimate and feasible measures to promote the fulfillment of its inherent purpose: protection of workers’ right. It is desired that some meaningful improvement in the labor related law should take place to sufficiently and substantially guarantee trade union with the opportunities to its political actions.
Each item of restriction above may seem remote or unconnected to one another at a glance. However, when we study some concrete intentions expressed during the process of the legislation, it is hard to miss that the lawmakers have looked at trade union with deep distrust. In particular, it is believed that lawmakers used to think that ‘trade union will surely be contaminated by impure forces and eventually fail to fulfill its inherent functions if not put under relevant restrictions’. Accordingly, lawmakers have built up some supervisory and restrictive measures on trade union in the name of its political neutrality or democratic operation. Under the influence of such restrictive measures, trade union had to undergo many difficulties in making its advance toward the political empowerment throughout the history of labor law.
The restrictive measures above have gradually been abolished since the June Movement in 1987 and the enactment of Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act in 1997. Thus, considerable portion of the restrictive mechanism is no longer functional as of now. However, due to the inertia of former legislations that have applied for few decades, the political actions and political empowerment of trade union are still considered taboos in Korean society. However, the advance of trade union to the political fields is believed to be a consistent flow. And restrictive legislations on the political actions of trade union do not seem to be ultimate and feasible measures to promote the fulfillment of its inherent purpose: protection of workers’ right. It is desired that some meaningful improvement in the labor related law should take place to sufficiently and substantially guarantee trade union with the opportunities to its political actions.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 노동조합의 정치활동 통제에 관한 규율
Ⅲ. 노동조합의 조합비에 관한 통제
Ⅳ. 노동조합 임원 자격 관련 통제
Ⅴ. 노동조합 조직·운영에 대한 제3자 개입금지
Ⅵ. 노동조합 재정 및 운영에 대한 통제
Ⅶ. 노동조합에 대한 해산명령
Ⅷ. 나오며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
New Trade Restrictive Measures and Exports: Evidence from South Korea
Seoul Journal of Economics
2019 .01
-
경비원조와 노동조합의 자주성 - 헌법재판소 2018. 5. 31. 2012헌바90 결정 이후 해석론과 입법론을 중심으로 -
노동법학
2019 .06
-
투표 참여에 있어 노동조합 효과 분석
산업관계연구
2020 .12
-
단결선택권과 단결하지 아니할 자유를 고려한 단결강제 제도의 모색
노동법학
2020 .03
-
노동조합 설립신고제도의 개선방안 - ILO 협약 비준과 교섭창구 단일화제도와의 정합성을 중심으로 -
노동법논총
2019 .08
-
복수노조와 부당노동행위 : 노동조합들 간의 분쟁과 부당노동행위
법학연구
2016 .02
-
공무원노동조합의 조직형태 변경 : 변경 전 · 후의 노동조합의 개념과 조직형태 변경의 허용한계 등을 중심으로
법학연구
2016 .09
-
조직형태 변경 절차의 주체로서 노동조합의 개념에 관한 해석론 : ‘독일에서의 단결체 개념을 중심으로’
노동법논총
2015 .04
-
산별노조 임원 등 조합원의 개별 사업장 출입에 관한 법적 문제
노동법학
2019 .12
-
노동조합의 조직형태 변경
노동법연구
2018 .09
-
노조설립신고 제도와 국제노동기준
노동법포럼
2019 .02
-
노동조합 합병의 법리와 합병의 효력발생 요건 - 대법원 2016.12.27. 선고 2011두921 판결 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2018 .02
-
유니온 숍 협정과 부당해고, 부당노동행위 - 대법원 2019. 11. 28. 선고 2019두47377 판결을 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2020 .11
-
노동조합의 전임자 급여지급 금지와 근로시간 면제제도의 의의 및 한계
강원법학
2020 .06
-
노동조합 설립무효의 확인 또는 노동조합으로서 법적 지위가 부존재한다는 확인을 구하는 민사상 소가 허용되는지 여부 -대상판결: 대법원 2021. 2. 25. 선고 2017다51610 판결
사법
2021 .09
-
노동조합과 기본소득
뉴 래디컬 리뷰
2020 .12
-
ILO ‘결사의 자유’ 핵심협약 관련 노조법상의 쟁점 해결 방안 : 단결권에 관한 사항을 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .12
-
교원노조법 제2조의 합헌 판단에 대한 비판적 검토 : 대상결정 : 2015. 5. 28. 2013헌마671, 2014헌가21(병합)
노동법학
2015 .09
-
노동조합의 두 얼굴과 정치참여
질서경제저널
2020 .01
-
복수노동조합 하의 유니언숍협정의 해석론과 과제
노동법논총
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0