메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비교정부학회 한국비교정부학보 한국비교정부학보 제23권 제3호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
135 - 168 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Europe, together with United States, has led the growth of the pharmaceutical industry around the world. However, some criticized that principle of competition did not work well due to the structural and regulatory characteristics of the pharmaceutical industry. In 2009, the EU Commission conducted sector inquiry on the pharmaceutical industry and reviewed various legal issues in the perspective of the EU competition rules. After the sector inquiry, EU competition authorities have actively enforced their competition rules on the pharmaceutical industry and have actively prepared and implemented competition policies for the industry. Finally, at the request of the EU Parliament and the EU Council, the EU Commission recently submitted a report which includes representative cases and relevant statistics of EU competition authorities on the pharmaceutical industry. Because the industry size is very large and lots of dominant companies have been existed, violations of competition rules have been occurred in various forms and ways. In the perspective of comparative law and comparative administration, it is highly valuable to research about how the EU competition rules, which has played a major role in the global competition law with the United States, has addressed the behaviors. However, since the KFTC published the competition policy report on pharmaceutical industry in 2009, there have been few studies in Korea which reviewed competition law enforcement of EU competition authorities on the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore, this article reviews the recent report of the EU Commission and tries to find implications on the enforcement of MRFTA and relevant competition policy. First, regarding the antitrust enforcement, it seems that the KFTC have mainly focused on rebate issue in the pharmaceutical industry. It is time for the KFTC to review other type of violations which the EU competition authorities have regulated, such as misuse of patent system and other regulatory frameworks for preventing generic companies from entering the market, disparagement the quality or safety of generic drugs for preventing generic companies from entering the market, and the excessive pricing by the original companies. Also, regarding the merger regulation, it is necessary for the KFTC to carefully review the concerns about innovation competition in merger cases involving the industry and find the best remedies through sufficient consultation with the merging entities. For this, experiences of the EU competition authorities on the innovation competition in merger cases of pharmaceutical companies would be great helpful. Additionally, regarding the competition policy, market monitoring about the pharmaceutical industry should be carried out more regularly by the KFTC with reference to the experience of EU competition authorities. Finally, it is necessary for the KFTC to check loopholes in other regulations related to the pharmaceutical industry from the perspective of competition law through competition advocacy activities.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (50)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0