메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김성은 (중앙대학교) 박진철 (중앙대학교) 류형규 (대한기계설비산업연구원)
저널정보
대한설비공학회 설비공학논문집 설비공학논문집 제32권 제1호
발행연도
2020.1
수록면
21 - 26 (6page)
DOI
10.6110/KJACR.2020.32.1.021

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The standards for energy-saving in buildings have been steadily strengthened because of the mandatory zero-energy buildings. But the insulation standards for heating and cooling water piping have been applied since 2002, without major changes. Thus, this study is a basic research step in proposing energy-saving insulation standards for building piping in preparation for mandatory zero energy, and the criteria for domestic and foreign piping insulation thickness were investigated. Surface temperature was compared when each thickness criterion was applied. As a result of the domestic and abroad standard comparison, the domestic standard (KCS) for insulation of piping stipulates the type and thickness of insulation material. However, the AHRAE standard is defined for thermal conductivity. The simulation analysis with piping insulation thickness according to each criterion showed that for low temperatures, the heat transmission coefficient was 0.9 W/㎡·K, ASHRAE 0.72 W/㎡·K, respectively, and the surface temperature was 6°C higher. For medium temperatures, the heat transmission coefficient of the KCS was 0.72 W/㎡․K, and ASHRAE was 0.488 W/㎡·K, respectively, and the surface temperature was 18°C higher for the KCS. Additionally, when applying the KCS standard, the heat loss per unit length was 1.1 times higher (KCS 4,525.6 W/m, ASHRAE 4,110.6 W/m) for low temperatures and 1.25 times higher (KCS 5,635.0 W/m, ASHRAE 4,519.4 W/m) for medium temperatures than in the case of applying the ASHRAE. The thermal performance of the insulating materials according to the ASHRAE standards is better than that of following the KCS. Thus, the domestic standard also needs to change the thickness of the insulation to the heat conductivity standard rather than the designation for the type of insulation.

목차

Abstract
1. 연구배경 및 목적
2. 연구방법
3. 국내외 온수배관 단열기준 비교
4. 시뮬레이션 결과 및 분석
5. 결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-553-000234257