지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第119號
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 331 - 354 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2019.12.119.331
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As a way of finding out how the scholars in Ming and Ching Dynasties evaluated the poems made in Han Dynasty, 4 collection books of ancient poems such as "Gosigi","Chaesukdanggosiseon","Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok" were selected for the comparative analysis of the poems made in Han Dynasty. These 4 collection books are something in common as they are the books of the old poems complied by the type of poems and that they have the same selection range.
As for the ratio of poems made in Han Dynasty among the total poems collected in 4 collection books, the poems made in Han Dynasty take up about 5.4% in Gosigi, and about 18% in Gosiwon. They take up as high as 15% in Gosisangseok, thus showing that the poems made in Han Dynasty were highly evaluated. As for the layout, in case of Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made in Han Dynasty are put in the front section of the collection books, unlike the layout made in other 3 collection books.
The poems made in Han Dynasty in 4 collection books of ancient poems were made in the list and, based on them, the characteristics of the poems made in Han Dynasty can be summarized as follows.
First, in Gosigi, Gosiwon and Gosisangseok, the poems whose authors are known are put in front section of the books, followed by the poems made by minganakbu and those whose authors are unknown while in Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made by minganakbu were put in the front section of the books.
Second, as for the ratio of minganakbu among the poems made in Han Dynasty in each collection books, it was high with 40.3% for Gosigi and 46.3% for Gosisangseok while it was the lowest with 36% in Gosiwon, thus showing the different evaluation for minganakbu. In addition, as for the type of minganakbu, there was no jipgayosa in Chaesukdanggosiseon, thus showing that there have been the different perspectives over the type of minganakbu.
Third, the fact that 65 poems which were made in Han Dynasty as acquired from the joint list of 4 collection books show that they are still highly appreciated even in the collection of books of poems made in Ming and Ching Dynasties.
As for the ratio of poems made in Han Dynasty among the total poems collected in 4 collection books, the poems made in Han Dynasty take up about 5.4% in Gosigi, and about 18% in Gosiwon. They take up as high as 15% in Gosisangseok, thus showing that the poems made in Han Dynasty were highly evaluated. As for the layout, in case of Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made in Han Dynasty are put in the front section of the collection books, unlike the layout made in other 3 collection books.
The poems made in Han Dynasty in 4 collection books of ancient poems were made in the list and, based on them, the characteristics of the poems made in Han Dynasty can be summarized as follows.
First, in Gosigi, Gosiwon and Gosisangseok, the poems whose authors are known are put in front section of the books, followed by the poems made by minganakbu and those whose authors are unknown while in Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made by minganakbu were put in the front section of the books.
Second, as for the ratio of minganakbu among the poems made in Han Dynasty in each collection books, it was high with 40.3% for Gosigi and 46.3% for Gosisangseok while it was the lowest with 36% in Gosiwon, thus showing the different evaluation for minganakbu. In addition, as for the type of minganakbu, there was no jipgayosa in Chaesukdanggosiseon, thus showing that there have been the different perspectives over the type of minganakbu.
Third, the fact that 65 poems which were made in Han Dynasty as acquired from the joint list of 4 collection books show that they are still highly appreciated even in the collection of books of poems made in Ming and Ching Dynasties.
목차
1. 서론
2. 4종 古詩選集 體例와 漢代 詩歌
3. 4종 古詩選集 중 漢代 詩歌 수록현황
4. 4종 古詩選集 중 漢代 詩歌 분류상의 특징
5. 결론
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
李白＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(7) — 제30수에서 제31수까지
중국어문논총
2019 .01
-
李白 ＜贈＞詩 譯解 및 考察(8) — 제32수에서 제34수까지
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
明 · 淸시기 4종 古詩總 · 選集에 나타난 北朝 詩歌의 選錄 현황과 분석 - 『古詩記』 · 『采菽堂古詩選』 · 『古詩源』 · 『古詩賞析』을 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2024 .12
-
신동문의 시 전집에 누락된 시편 연구
한국시학연구
2020 .02
-
橘山 李裕元의 燕行과 記錄 - 『燕槎日錄』을 중심으로 -
동방한문학
2022 .06
-
우리말 (외 1수)
중국조선어문
2018 .11
-
王維 連作詩 章法 分析
중국어문학논집
2023 .12
-
李白〈贈〉詩 譯解(3) : 제11수에서 제16수까지
중국문화연구
2015 .08
-
현대 장시(長詩)의 본질과 범주에 대한 재고찰
한국현대문학연구
2017 .08
-
李白＜贈＞詩 譯解(2) ― (제6수에서 제10수까지)
중국어문논총
2015 .06
-
조선후기 잡체시 창작상의 몇 가지 특징
동양한문학연구
2019 .01
-
文?作品句子?面??模糊性及其???究－以≪唐?三百首≫?例－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
어촌 심언광의 역사제재 한시에 관한 고찰
연민학지
2024 .02
-
고전시가 분석에서의 자연어처리 활용 ― 次韻詩詩句의 부자연스러움 증명
중국어문학논집
2022 .08
-
中韩古代禽言诗比较研究
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
容齋 李荇의 詠物詩 研究
동아시아고대학
2019 .01
-
“닫힘의 거부”: 린 헤지니언의 경계를 가로지르는 시 쓰기
현대영미시연구
2016 .01
-
夢窩 金昌集의 ｢述懷詩｣ 硏究
南冥學硏究
2020 .01
-
남구만의 『약천집』 「시」의 편집상의 특징 고찰(2)
국학연구
2018 .03
-
창작 주체에 따른 청소년 시의 내용 양상 연구 : 상호인정의 문제를 중심으로
어문학
2019 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-820-000344574