지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 노동법이론실무학회 노동법포럼 노동법포럼 제29호
- 발행연도
- 2020.2
- 수록면
- 241 - 268 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.46329/LLF.2020.02.29.241
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The recent emergence of new employment types called as platform labor has different characteristics from the traditional employment type. Therefore, unlike the traditional employment relationship, the platform labor has the protective problem under the labor law. In fact, the platform labor consists of tripartite relationships (Demand-Platform-Supplier) in general although the contractual types are various. In this regard, this may lead to controversy over which the supplier’s employment pattern may be classified in its substance(Employees or self-employed). This controversy may lead to the following assignments of legislative policy for platform workers.
First of all, the assignments of future legislative policy on the platform labor shall go through the social discussions and consultations sufficiently based on the survey of platform workers. In other words, it is necessary to prepare for the legislative measures to improve the working conditions and the environment by classifying the employment types after the fact-finding of platform workers is identified. In particular, the specific protection subjects and scopes shall be considered under the positions of interesting parties and the consistency of the labor-related law system. Finally, the law that is enacted or amended through social discussions and agreements shall be reviewed subsequently.
Thus, the assignments of future legislative policy related to platform labor may be largely composed of three aspects. First, the systematic survey of platform workers is needed. The reason for this is that it has been difficult to prepare for the measures of legislative policy for platform workers since there are no official government statistics until now. Second, there is a need to prepare for the legislative measures for platform workers because the rapid spread of platform labor around the world recently so that Korea also needs the legislative action against it. Third, the Korean government needs to create the conditions in order that the stakeholders related to platform labor may prepare for a voluntary common code of conduct. The reason is that the legislative measures for platform workers are expected to take considerable time so that a short-term approach is needed.
First of all, the assignments of future legislative policy on the platform labor shall go through the social discussions and consultations sufficiently based on the survey of platform workers. In other words, it is necessary to prepare for the legislative measures to improve the working conditions and the environment by classifying the employment types after the fact-finding of platform workers is identified. In particular, the specific protection subjects and scopes shall be considered under the positions of interesting parties and the consistency of the labor-related law system. Finally, the law that is enacted or amended through social discussions and agreements shall be reviewed subsequently.
Thus, the assignments of future legislative policy related to platform labor may be largely composed of three aspects. First, the systematic survey of platform workers is needed. The reason for this is that it has been difficult to prepare for the measures of legislative policy for platform workers since there are no official government statistics until now. Second, there is a need to prepare for the legislative measures for platform workers because the rapid spread of platform labor around the world recently so that Korea also needs the legislative action against it. Third, the Korean government needs to create the conditions in order that the stakeholders related to platform labor may prepare for a voluntary common code of conduct. The reason is that the legislative measures for platform workers are expected to take considerable time so that a short-term approach is needed.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 플랫폼노동의 정의 등
Ⅲ. 주요 쟁점사항
Ⅳ. 현행법 규정과 학설 및 판례의 경향
Ⅴ. 국내 및 해외의 입법 · 정책적 방향
Ⅵ. 향후 입법 · 정책적 과제
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (2)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
디지털 전환시대 플랫폼 노동자의 법적 보호방안
법학연구
2021 .06
-
플랫폼 노동, 제3의 지위가 해법인가? - 미국의 입법 동향을 중심으로 -
노동법포럼
2021 .02
-
플랫폼 노동자의 근로권에 관한 헌법적 검토
헌법학연구
2024 .09
-
플랫폼노동 조직화 모델 제안: 플랫폼노동과 그림자노동 관점의 통합
경영학연구
2023 .02
-
플랫폼 노동자의 근로자성
노동법포럼
2021 .02
-
지금 왜 다시 사용자인가?: 플랫폼 노동관계에서 사용자 찾기
노동법포럼
2020 .11
-
플랫폼노동 종사자의 노동법적 쟁점과 보호방안
아주법학
2020 .01
-
플랫폼 노동과 사회계약의 재구성
시민과세계
2022 .06
-
우리나라의 플랫폼노동에 관한 논의
동아법학
2023 .02
-
플랫폼 노동 입법 논의의 성과와 과제
산업관계연구
2022 .12
-
플랫폼과 가사노동자 : 노동법적 보호를 중심으로
이화젠더법학
2019 .12
-
디지털 플랫폼노동 확산과 위험성에 대한 비판적 검토
경제와사회
2020 .03
-
한국에서의 플랫폼노동에 대한 법제화 논의 현황과 쟁점
강원법학
2021 .02
-
직업안정법을 통한 플랫폼노동중개의 규율 가능성과 과제
노동법학
2019 .06
-
플랫폼 노무제공자에 관한 논의와 쟁점
일감법학
2022 .12
-
미국의 플랫폼종사자 보호와 규제방식
노동법연구
2024 .09
-
노동 4.0 백서의 후속 입법 동향과 법·정책 과제 ― 고용분야를 중심으로 ―
노동법학
2022 .06
-
프랑스의 플랫폼 노동에 관한 법제
강원법학
2021 .02
-
중국 플랫폼 종사자의 직무 만족 연구
산업과 경영
2021 .12
-
플랫폼노동종사자에 대한 사회보장법적 보호 ― 산재보험법과 고용보험법을 중심으로 ―
노동법학
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-360-000385312