지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제116호
- 발행연도
- 2020.6
- 수록면
- 361 - 388 (28page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2020.06.116.361
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Choe Myeong-gil is famous for maintaining Juhwaron(主和論) for the dynasty and the people in the 17th century in the forefront of Joseon’s diplomacy. Based on his political and diplomatic actions, this book seeks to find the path of Korean diplomacy today by exploring the appropriate strategic actions of Joseon between two great powers, Ming and Qing. In addition, this book describes the overall life of Choe Myeong-gil, and deals with major domestic and international issues related to it, giving a glimpse of the Joseon society in general. In this way, this book has great academic value and meaning in that it has been published as a high-quality public history book by reconstituting the study of Choe Myeong-gil in the Korean academic world after 1945 in the form of a critical biography.
However, there are some problems caused by the author’s overestimation of Choe’s life and behavior. Why did Choe Myeong-gil take the lead in the ouster of Gwanghaegun(光海君), who was an outstanding diplomatic strategist like himself? Why did Choe Myeong-gil maintain a friendly attitude to Ming as much as a a proponent of Cheokhwaron(斥和論) after the end of Byeongjahoran(丙子胡亂)? This book’s explanation for these questions is not only sketchy, but also inconsistent. In addition, this book did not provide detailed explanation and analysis of Choe’s ideological orientation or mentality related to the perception of Zhonghua(中華). Nevertheless, this book is highly regarded in that it laid a solid foothold not only for research on Choe Myeong-gil in the future, but also for the study of political history in the second half of the King Injo’s political history.
However, there are some problems caused by the author’s overestimation of Choe’s life and behavior. Why did Choe Myeong-gil take the lead in the ouster of Gwanghaegun(光海君), who was an outstanding diplomatic strategist like himself? Why did Choe Myeong-gil maintain a friendly attitude to Ming as much as a a proponent of Cheokhwaron(斥和論) after the end of Byeongjahoran(丙子胡亂)? This book’s explanation for these questions is not only sketchy, but also inconsistent. In addition, this book did not provide detailed explanation and analysis of Choe’s ideological orientation or mentality related to the perception of Zhonghua(中華). Nevertheless, this book is highly regarded in that it laid a solid foothold not only for research on Choe Myeong-gil in the future, but also for the study of political history in the second half of the King Injo’s political history.
목차
머리말
1. 책의 내용과 학술적 의의
2. 최명길과 주화론
3. 인조 정권과 척화론
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000839449