메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
표시연 (숙명여자대학교)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제45권 제2호
발행연도
2020.6
수록면
401 - 420 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With the rapid development of mobile devices, the popularity of mobile-assisted learning has been increased, allowing L2 learners to access millions of apps for learning, but their appropriateness in terms of vocabulary levels or learning types has not been discussed yet. In this respect, this study attempts to figure out characteristics of mobile apps for learning English vocabulary with focus on word lists and mobile learning types. To this end, 14 widely used apps for English vocabulary learning for seniors of elementary school were selected, and the word lists were compared to see how the lists reflect the basic word list presented by the 2015 revised English curriculum. Then this study set up a criterion designed to classify e-learning types of the apps, categorized them into five according to the criterion, and explored each in detail. Some findings were revealed from the analysis. First, the reflection rates of the 2015 basic word list were not comparatively high. Only 3 out of 14 apps reflected more than 90% of the basic word list. Secondly, learning types of the apps were considered suitable for self-directed learning overall, including a variety of functions and games that enable L2 learners to involve repeatable learning through flash cards or quizzes. However, most functions of the apps focused on acquiring forms and meaning of words referring to receptive knowledge of vocabulary. Finally, the study suggests considering higher reflection rates of the 2015 basic word list for students to improve their vocabulary learning efficiency, and mobile learning methods designed to acquire productive knowledge on actual usage of words in developing apps for vocabulary learning for the future.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구 방법
4. 결과 및 논의
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-701-000883003