메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Segmentation of Control Areas and Land Fragmentation in Non-Urban Area : Focusing on Hwaseong
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jang, Saewoom (Pusan National University) Jung, Juchul (Pusan National University)
Journal
Korea Planning Association Journal of Korea Planning Association Vol.55 No.3(Wn.249) KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
Published
2020.6
Pages
17 - 28 (12page)
DOI
10.17208/jkpa.2020.06.55.3.17

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Segmentation of Control Areas and Land Fragmentation in Non-Urban Area : Focusing on Hwaseong
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of management policy by looking at changes in land fragmentation in non-urban areas. This study defines and analyzes the phenomena of land fragmentation and sprawl in non-urban areas, which are critical in the policy. We have examined changes in land patterns before and after the period when the Segmentation of Control areas policy was enforced. We selected Hwaseong City as the subject of the research and then focused on the Used-Areas, one of the seven categories in the Land Cover Maps of 2001, 2007, 2009, and 2014, to examine the changes in land-cover fragmentation patterns. Fragstats program was used to quantitatively analyze the fragmentation pattern of land. Through a literature review, we selected seven indices related to (1) the size and the number of land patches, (2) the patch shape and complexity, and (3) the isolation and connection caused by fragmentation. Quantitative values were used to investigate the changes in value before and after 2008.
The indices related to the size and the number of the land patches in the Used-Areas show that there were more subdivisions and smaller developments after 2008 than before. The shapes of patches became more complex after the policy period but one thing to note is that the values don’t have a dynamic range. The values of the indices related to isolation and connectivity indicate that more patches were isolated and had less connection in 2009–2014 than in 2001–2007. These results show that sporadic development of small scale has continued to occur even after the implementation of the Segmentation of Control areas policy.

Contents

Abstract
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Non-urban Area Policy Theories and Sprawl-related Literature Review
Ⅲ. Analysis of Land Fragmentation after the Implementation of Segmentation of Control Areas Policy in Non-urban Areas
Ⅳ. Summary and Conclusion
References

References (41)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-539-000851425