메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Volume 10 Number 2 (June 2007)
발행연도
2007.6
수록면
75 - 89 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Based on the meaning of work (MOW) research and the typology of work-leisure relations developed by Wilensky and Parker, this study investigates the relationship between work-leisure orientation and the meaning of work domain variables, including work centrality, work ethic, intrinsic value, extrinsic value, and job satisfaction. The 2006 Korean Value Survey (KVS) dataset was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance and multinomial logistic regression analysis. The results show that work-oriented respondents have larger value for work centrality variable and smaller value for work ethic than the leisure-oriented. The work-leisure relations for the work centrality and the work ethic are characterized as an ‘identity/spillover’ model. No significant difference was found between work-oriented and leisure-oriented respondents regarding both the intrinsic value and the extrinsic value. This implies that a ‘separateness/segmentation’ model properly characterizes the work-leisure relations for intrinsic and the extrinsic values. The multinomial logistic regression analysis of work-leisure relations shows that as job satisfaction increases in value, the likelihood of being leisure-oriented decreases, suggesting that a ‘contrast/compensation’ model be the proper characterization of the relations. The nature of the relationship between meaning of work variables and leisure orientation defies any simple generalization, and contradicts the conventional approaches that consider work and leisure to be unitary concepts and attempt to establish which of the three models best characterizes their relationship.

목차

Introduction
Conceptual Framework
Data and Method
Analysis and Discussion
Summary and Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000954272