메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: For the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction, endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) has been widelyaccepted as a standard procedure. However, post-ERBD complications can affect the lives of patients. The purpose of this study was toidentify the predictive factors for these complications, including the patient’s status, cancer status, and stent type. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis conducted in a single tertiary hospital from January 2007 to July 2017. The followingvariables were evaluated: sex, age, body mass index, cancer type, history of pancreatitis, gallbladder stone, previous biliary stenting, precutpapillotomy, stent type, contrast injection into the pancreatic duct or gallbladder, cystic duct invasion by the tumor, and occlusion ofthe cystic duct orifice by a metal stent. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that contrast injection into the pancreatic duct was a risk factor for pancreatitis. Patients with ahistory of bile drainage showed a lower risk of pancreatitis. For cholecystitis, the analysis revealed contrast injection into the gallbladderand cystic duct invasion by the tumor as important predictive factors. Metal stents showed a greater risk of post-procedure pancreatitisthan plastic stents, but did not affect the incidence of cholecystitis. Conclusions: Considering that contrast injection is the most important factor for both complications, a careful approach by thephysician is essential in preventing the occurrence of any complications. Further, choosing the type of stent is an important factor forpatients at a risk of post-procedure pancreatitis.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0