지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Airworthiness authorities specify the technical standards of airworthiness that propose minimum requirement of the commercial transport category and apply the rules in the certification process to ensure the safety of the aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration and other national airworthiness authorities define the fatal accident risk levels for the safety assessment of the aircraft system and establish standard procedures to apply both qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques. However, an accident or incident may occur by the combination of various factors, although the aircraft is designed in accordance with the strict standards and approval by the Airworthiness Authorities. There are some key factors, such as human error, unpredictable complex system failures, degradation of the components reliability, improper maintenance task and intervals. Risk can be reduced by reflecting aircraft operational experience with similar types of aircraft in the process of aircraft development and safety assessment. Result of the root cause analysis for the Airbus A300-600 incident in which the aircraft engine reverser was deployed in the air have been introduced to reflect the design of system and related components. Also, this paper suggests to create a big-database in order to provide a feed-back to the FAR Part 25 transport category design and safety assessment of the operational experience.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
2013 / 국토교통부 훈령 제 40호, 항공기 형식 증명 지침
2011 / System Safety Analysis and Assessment for Part 23 Airplanes
1988 / System Design Analysis
1996 / SAE ARP4761, Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment
구민성 / 2013 / 지속 감항성 유지 프로그램 운영 경험의 항공기 설계와 인증 단계 적용 / 한국항공운항학회지 21(3):9~14
2011 / System Safety Analysis and Assessment for Part 23 Airplanes
1988 / System Design Analysis
1996 / SAE ARP4761, Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment
구민성 / 2013 / 지속 감항성 유지 프로그램 운영 경험의 항공기 설계와 인증 단계 적용 / 한국항공운항학회지 21(3):9~14
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0