메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박효춘 (강남대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.57 No.1
발행연도
2021.3
수록면
31 - 54 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to identify the duality of reconciliation shown in Measure for Measure and to consider what is the background of such duality. The good impression of the duke, who is portrayed as a generous and competent monarch in the play, is likely to spread to Londoners’ liking for King James I in reality. It is because the duke avoided criticism by directing citizens’ grievances to Angelo through delegating the monarch’s authority to correct the legal order in Vienna. Furthermore, it can be seen that the Duke is favored by citizens as a generous monarch through ordering marriage instead of punishment for those who should be punished by because of their crime.
Thus, the duke is thought to have a facet of a Machiavellian monarch who is clever and politically skillful. From this perspective, we can say that Angelo was a political scapegoat for the Duke. The duke declares a very unusual and lenient punishment to marry Mariana instead, even though Angelo committed a felony of abuse of power.
It is clear that Angelo did not want to marry Mariana, so the order can be said to be a kind of punishment. The writer believes that the duke did not want to punish Angelo for bringing him political benefits, which is why Angelo secretly receives a gift from the duke, a relatively light punishment of marriage orders. In that sense, the duke’s marriage order as a way of reconciliation can be interpreted in a double sense.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-840-001635245