지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.100 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2021.4
- 수록면
- 246 - 251 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common treatments worldwide, but there are few studies about the use of mesh in late adolescent patients because hernias are rare in this group. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of hernia repair with and without mesh in late adolescent patients.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 243 male patients aged between 18 and 21 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair at a single institution from January 2013 to December 2017. We distinguished 2 groups depending on the repair method; mesh (n = 121) and no-mesh (n = 122) groups. We compared the baseline characteristics, immediate postoperative outcomes, and recurrence and chronic pain rates between the 2 groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the mesh and no-mesh groups on immediate postoperative outcomes (length of stay: 18.5 ± 8.9 days vs. 17.0 ± 6.0 days, P = 0.139; postoperative complications: 8.2% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.821) and 2-year recurrence rate (0.8% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.194). There was a significant difference in the chronic pain rate (9.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.023).
Conclusion: Using mesh for inguinal hernia repair in late adolescent male patients increases chronic postoperative inguinal pain.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 243 male patients aged between 18 and 21 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair at a single institution from January 2013 to December 2017. We distinguished 2 groups depending on the repair method; mesh (n = 121) and no-mesh (n = 122) groups. We compared the baseline characteristics, immediate postoperative outcomes, and recurrence and chronic pain rates between the 2 groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the mesh and no-mesh groups on immediate postoperative outcomes (length of stay: 18.5 ± 8.9 days vs. 17.0 ± 6.0 days, P = 0.139; postoperative complications: 8.2% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.821) and 2-year recurrence rate (0.8% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.194). There was a significant difference in the chronic pain rate (9.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.023).
Conclusion: Using mesh for inguinal hernia repair in late adolescent male patients increases chronic postoperative inguinal pain.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
Kingsnorth A / 2003 / Hernias:inguinal and incisional / Lancet 362:1561~1571
Burcharth J / 2013 / Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair / PLoS One 8:e54367
Brandt ML / 2008 / Pediatric hernias / Surg Clin North Am 88:27~43
Ruhl CE / 2007 / Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population / Am J Epidemiol 165:1154~1161
HerniaSurge Group / 2018 / International guidelines for groin hernia management / Hernia 22:1~165
Burcharth J / 2013 / Nationwide prevalence of groin hernia repair / PLoS One 8:e54367
Brandt ML / 2008 / Pediatric hernias / Surg Clin North Am 88:27~43
Ruhl CE / 2007 / Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population / Am J Epidemiol 165:1154~1161
HerniaSurge Group / 2018 / International guidelines for groin hernia management / Hernia 22:1~165
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Fundamentals of Inguinal Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Comparison of partially-absorbable lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair : multicenter randomized study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .12
-
Inguinal hernia
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Ultrasound imaging for inguinal hernia: a pictorial review
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2022 .07
-
[Hernia] Is Inguinal Hernia Repair Really Dangerous for High-Risk Patients? : A Single-Center Experience
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
[Hernia] Safety Management in the Introduction of Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
How to Perform Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Inguinal hernia surgery in Korea: nationwide data from 2007-2015
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2019 .07
-
Retrospective study on prevalence of recurrent inguinal hernia: a large-scale multi-institutional study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .01
-
Mesh-related Infections after Hernia Repair Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
All about The Mesh for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Emergency Surgery for Inguinal Hernia
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Mesh Positions for Ventral Hernia Repair: Techniques and Outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Comparison of Desarda technique hernia repair and Mesh hernia repair. Do we need a more clever strategy to treat our hernia patients?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
Long Term Follow-up Results of Desarda Technique Hernia Repair And Comparison with Mesh Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Bilateral Inguinal Hernia. The Incidence Is Higher than We Know
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Prevention of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
One-year experience of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach in a single institute: 2 different surgeons with different levels of experience
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .03
-
Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair of fallopian tube indirect inguinal hernia in reproductive aged woman: a case report
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2017 .01
-
Optimal timing for inguinal hernia repair in premature infants: surgical issues for inguinal hernia in premature infants
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-514-001697928